Information behind the fragmentation pattern of the networking industry ---- Talk nine

is probably a quarter century ago, I removed from the Department of Sociology, Columbia University, New York, a postgraduate student.Occasionally, professors have the opportunity to participate in some social activities.One day, the father of modern sociology Merton (Robert Merton), a cocktail party at home, I happened to hear the guidance of Professor Blau (Peter Blau) and comparative literature professor Edward Said (Edward Said) a chat.Broughton is one of the few theorists of sociology, in organization theory, exchange theory and structural theory, be regarded as a people.He fled to the U.S.from Austria during World War II the Jews, so deeply influenced by German and Austrian school, pay attention to rigorous logic, argument and valid, is more old-fashioned positivist science.Said health was the thunder of deconstruction is one of the leading figures, in their prime.He was born in Jerusalem's Arab Christian family in the UK by the higher education, even the name is half-English half-Arab, but the soul Quedui Western academic system with considerable suspicion and denial, as in the critique of Western society Center accomplished academic traditions.At the reception, half-laugh, half in earnest to Broughton on Saeed said: Now my students are obsessed with deconstruction, ah, we are not good after this set of constructivism.I find something that you look at the book and found that in addition to criticize our deconstruction, but nothing in themselves.A person apart from others in the busy deconstruction, there was always something a little bit their own, right? Said very witty replies: I have to put your old stuff torn down to build those new things ah.Having said two laugh, turned around to find someone to chat with each go.

shallow in my scholarship, of course, on two of the verbal exchanges could not get What makes sense on the words.However, in the subconscious, I prefer Blau's position.Not only because I was his student, but also because my own youth during the Cultural Revolution experience.At that time, everyone is a big critic to understand do not understand the matter, telling anyone grant can not be wrong.Ten years before that, some people do not mind, chaos to follow suit; some of the people to protect themselves or to seek any benefit.So, has always been on the professional critics, literary critics and theory at arm's length, on both the inheritance of the past have criticized the same time, new things have come to their own people feel more closer.This is a bit ironic as the Peking University students early, like we were college students: North is the bee, not only sting people, but also the honey; the NPC is the wasp, the light sting, no honey.Therefore, mixed with great difficulty out of the country, always wanted changed, but so be a bee.Limited to the point that I read the works of deconstruction, in that respect the limitations of the traditional Western academic scholars of deconstruction does contribute, but he did not favor the new system.The old house was demolished was falling apart more, but built up the new house and ended up with vast expanse of the earth really clean.In terms of promoting the academic progress, their contribution to an extremely limited.

emergence of human society, the Internet entered a new historical stage, prototype of the information society is slowly formed.Full access to the Internet, social life is too short, too fast pace of development, the academic for this not also take a more systematic, more comprehensive view out of the profound.But the academic mainstream or a positive attitude and enthusiasm to explore the network industry, trying to keep up pace, all levels of society to understand and describe the changes and trends.At the same time, academics, thinkers, and public opinion also ran out of some people on the Internet everywhere, Cuikulaxiu, the development of overwhelming anxiety, even fear of social disorder which to the vulgar, the world thus collapse.Some time ago to attend a new media seminar in Guangzhou, the news from Hong Kong met a professor of communication, to experience a lot to shock the world of speech.He believes that the Internet is like AK47 rifles, simple to learn, low cost, so the murder weapon had been spread to many third world society is not the bottom of the hands of self-control.Thus, chaos, tragedy continued.He asserted that the simple dissemination of information of the Internet, the characteristics of low-cost and ubiquitous, the future of racial hatred through the Internet, regional conflicts and conflicts of interest will be unrestricted uncontrolled spread in the world, had never seen a human catastrophe in the history of coming.I asked him: if his analogy appropriate inference is correct, it should be done? No answer.This can be deconstructed home saying: that question, no answer.

In fact, although the absence of such an extreme statement, but the logic Recent comments interlinked frequent.On a more systematic exposition of this view, most but not made in China imports, the market circulation of just being popularized, simplified version of the cottage only.In some media corps Petty many Awaken is a source saying, only people who spread such remarks would not say, posing as the original Bale.For example, some people like to use the information recently fragmented, fragmentation survival, fragmentation of the world copied the concept of such attacks due to the popularity of the Internet phenomena generated and copied to the logic with the Chinese has become a yong all of society.Of course, if you copied a serious theory, the preacher's role socialization is needed.However, without analysis, one-sided alarmist but not really serious.Deconstruction and construction is thought necessary for different stages of progress, but do not build photolysis is not really true ability.

fragmentation of information is now really it? Maybe, depends on who is concerned.It is now less and less to buy a magazine and read an article for a newspaper to see a news item to buy, as was a message to keep a TV channel.Information on the Internet is simple and direct, the original ecological naked, people want to see what it wants to find themselves.In this sense, the online world of information fragmentation, because the last special someone wrote that series sells traditional media system of information dissemination channels are weakened, destroyed, replaced by a network to write said search code and rely on interpersonal the relationship between information dissemination system.When a new information dissemination system to replace the old things, many long-term survival of the old system of thought rely on brokers, news setter and information brokers have lost their original impact, market and development space.For them, the information in this fragmented world, the survival of fragmentation, and even pieces of the whole world.But the real ideas, news and information for producers and end-users, network information and the world is not fragmented, but more complete, more direct and effective communication between the two.20 years ago in terms of Yahoo's news portal service as the representative form, or 10 prior to the Google News search service as the representative form, and today the information represented by FACEBOOK chain relationships can be transmitted through the service form, the information network of the world Production is increasingly becoming an interconnected organic life, more efficient dissemination of accurate intelligence information.Some people are not accustomed to network thousands of public loud noise, a mouth that this chicken, duck mouth, truth and lies exist, the essence of the phenomenon of symbiosis with the dross that the performance of fragmented information.In fact, this is simply a reflection of the online world is breaking all kinds of real world constraints, to more accurately replicate the real world information and communication scene.In the online world, every person, whether he is the so-called elite or grass-roots, self-existence and have an equal right to self-expression.Everyone who is willing to grasp how much the basic skills to survive one o'clock the network, you can find the information you want to see that he wanted to spread or interactive objects, you can shield the information they do not want to see, away from the object they do not want contacts.Is there anything bad or wrong with it? Even some bad thoughts bad words spread faster than ever, but also good thoughts good words are the same or more efficient way to get spread ah, the overall pattern of change.Since the past because of bad thoughts bad society does not collapse words, why the Internet age society will deteriorate, become vulgar, variable crash it? It is argued that the traditional media rests in the power elite, the elite of wealth and ideas of the hands of the elite, so to spread the message that filtered through the professional processing and screening, and a good ideological and more bad thoughts less.But now Tun Town and the elite have the same right to speak, so the production and dissemination of bad ideas in number and influence in more than a good idea.This logic has a very dubious premise: that only by limiting the control of the public voice and speech can produce good ideas.In essence, we are very familiar with this logic of authoritarian ideology is exactly the same, only difference is that one is established on the basis of the power monopoly, a monopoly is built on the basis of thought and speech.lack of effective dissemination of good thoughts words, bad thoughts bad speech is flooded.Poor quality that the people alone, vulgar society can solve the problem? Alone insular, stand still can achieve what objectives? Deconstruction is the kind of players to construct words it is not the mediocrity of the media in which we are now in transition need.Social needs of the thoughts, words and the elite to address the collapse of traditional media, online media flourishing, like a ground-breaking new media reality; to take the initiative to actively participate in the construction of the new media to make up for lack of new things; to thinking together with the general public, words together, sharing together.Conversely, fragmentation can only be refused to change the old days the elite system.