|
Tags:, telecommunications, telecom tariff, ta
(View ID:535773)
the contrary the use of market transactions a result of misunderstanding due to the inevitable information asymmetry, to enlarge a certain perception of the public suspected of both grandstanding, but also highlights our relevant government departments in governing the level of low-level operating status. northern city Industrial and Commercial Bureau of Consumer Protection Department launched million people in the sun, then a single question telecommunications enterprises, why not to take second billing is a classic case of the aforementioned state-minute billing behavior.This is a time standard of the time and telecommunications companies can be perceived by the public during a call billing inconsistencies, to question the standards of measurement as a means grandstanding, so that a superficial understanding of the telecom tariff control"deviation" brutal management style. not to mention the business sector telecom tariff control functions in accordance with the Chinese People's Republic of Telecommunications Regulations, entangled in the telecom tariff metering standards themselves, in fact, the trends of the telecom tariff regulation and tariff reform ignorance. tariff regulation in the telecommunications, generally divided into the control of structural control and the price level in the price level of control, the current common practice have taken the basic cap regulation, that is the realization of the highest tariff regulation , the tariff of telecom companies can not exceed the highest price level of government. upper limit is generally considered the operating costs of the telecommunications companies, the competition does not exist, in theory, telecommunications companies can be ceiling prices.If the ceiling price of fees is ultimately a loss making telecom enterprises, the general government but also on certain subsidies, in order to maintain his normal operation. However, due to the presence of more than oligopolistic competition and advances in technology, plans telecommunications charges in accordance with the ceiling prices, but often continue to reduce their own expense the price level, the integrated tariff of the ten years to telecommunications annual percentage about 10 percent the speed of decline, in fact, benefit from the cap regulation. therefore, between the government and enterprises often there is a huge information asymmetry, although the Telecommunications Ordinance provides for telecommunications charges, take-cost pricing, the specific cost is the number of government often do not really accounting clear, but the upper limit pricing , coupled with the assessment of profits, you can encourage enterprises to adopt various means to reduce costs and provide better telecommunications services to the public through a competitive, continue to reduce the price level at their own expense. global telecommunications regulators in the telecommunications regulatory addition to clear what the pricing by the government, which should be taken subject to market regulation, there is no measurement standards of the telecommunications companies of any regulators will control requirements, such as Request-to-second billing or per minute billing. This can not help because the control requirement there is a huge price and cost information asymmetry between the government and enterprises, businesses and consumers, there is a huge administrative supervision over law enforcement costs, consumers exist the right to identify their own communication behavior (such as a call talk time on the phone and telecommunications companies charging time) and other great acts cost, and appears to not make any sense. regulators of the telecommunications industry, has long been recognized for the telecommunications industry this natural monopoly industries by introducing competition and let the market play a role in reducing overall telecom tariff through competition price level, to improve user service quality is the fundamental policy, this is precisely the reform of China's telecommunications industry continue through the restructuring to optimize the market structure of question of justice. Trade and Industry Bureau of the northern city as a non-professional and legal departments authorized himself as an ordinary consumer perspective, and guide the public to question the telecom tariff metering standards, and require telecommunications companies to change the metering method both a lack of understanding of the telecom tariff control, it is easy to mislead the public unrealistic expectations on the reform of China's telecommunications charges, but the key is that telecom tariff reform"into the ditch". market who are generally believed to rely on competition, rather than a tract of government departments, administrative instructions, consumers can enjoy a better price and service, if unavoidably, government departments must manage do not believe that consumers have the ability to vote with their feet, always the people as a child care that care fingered hand the ordinary course of business today, tomorrow and feet, and will ultimately hurt the ordinary people. (particular that: For the above text references and outlets must written consent, without consent out of context a reference to the one-sided and reproduced, seized on the issue of This per capita reserve the cause of any powers of the undue influence of any legal action resulting)
Experience the new version of blog
The
, telecommunications, telecom tariff, tariff, telecom companies, tariff regulation, the price level, the telecommunications industry, telecommunications regulation, tariff reform and, information asym
|
|
|
